Ask HN: What is the current state of web frameworks in Golang?

Re:Ask HN: What is the current state of web frameworks in Go... by someone13 on Saturday July 14, 2018 @12:09AM (#17528771)

I really like chi[0] - I think it strikes the right balance of being small and understandable, but also solving common problems (e.g. nested routes, URL parameters, etc.). It also uses standard Go conventions, so it's very interoperable and would be easy to migrate away from, if necessary.

[0]: https://github.com/go-chi/chi

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: What is the current state of web frameworks in Go... by AdamJacobMuller on Saturday July 14, 2018 @12:20AM (#17528806)

chi is cool, but, isn't really a framework. Chi is just a router and that's a lot of why I think `chi` is quite good.

I happen to be a fan of web[0] even though its basically a dead project, it works fine and is minimal enough to not need any changes.

[0] https://github.com/gocraft/web

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: What is the current state of web frameworks in Go... by ovao on Saturday July 14, 2018 @12:39AM (#17528854)

While chi is ‘just a router’ (and an exceptionally good one at that), it also includes a number of particularly useful middleware.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: What is the current state of web frameworks in Go... by AdamJacobMuller on Saturday July 14, 2018 @01:44AM (#17529013)

I don't mean to say "merely" a router. I think its good because it does one thing well.

[ Parent | on HN ]