Re:White House earmarks over $1B for quantum technology rese...
by blhack on Friday July 13, 2018 @06:10PM
(#17527277)
Couldn't the same argument have been made for the first person to develop gun powder? Boats? Domesticated horses? Tipped spears, etc.?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:White House earmarks over $1B for quantum technology rese...
by pfranz on Friday July 13, 2018 @07:55PM
(#17527819)
Weapons can be an endless pit of development and the US is not a conquering nation. Let's say we could sustain an economy and develop the first nuclear weapons while everyone else is using spears; what was the opportunity cost? What's the value if it's only used for defense?
Outside of defense I know a large military and weapons help in having influence, but so does having a stable and large economy--the later moreso.
Nuclear weapons were developed out of a competition for survival. The people involved knew even in the hands of the Allied forces it was extremely dangerous. You're arguing we should invest in a Space Force because someone else might do it in the future.