Verifying Transactional Consistency with Jepsen and FaunaDB

Re:Verifying Transactional Consistency with Jepsen and FaunaDB by sandstrom on Friday July 13, 2018 @04:09PM (#17526259)

Interesting to see new DBs cropping up! I think there is much to improve over the choices popular today.

However, it's difficult to quickly grasp what makes Fauna unique. A comparison with e.g. CockroachDB would be nice!

A good example of doing this well is RethinkDB, that provided two comparisons with MongoDB (one biased, one unbiased).

1. Technical comparison (unbiased):

2. Personal comparison (biased):

Consul (not a DB though) also has these comparisons:

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Verifying Transactional Consistency with Jepsen and FaunaDB by dhruvgupta on Friday July 13, 2018 @05:33PM (#17526904)

Some conversation on CockroachDB vs FaunaDB here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16878102

The primary difference is in the interface (SQL vs NoSQL), the transactional protocol, and capabilities such as built-in multi-tenancy, temporality..

Might be useful to note that GV invested in both (Fauna was after Cockroach).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Verifying Transactional Consistency with Jepsen and FaunaDB by sandstrom on Monday July 16, 2018 @03:53PM (#17544514)

Thanks!

[ Parent | on HN ]