News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Toml: Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language. Parent comment

Re:Toml: Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language by jhabdas on Friday July 13, 2018 @11:39AM (#17523844)
The one problem I've had, and perhaps I'm just doing something incorrectly, is going from a `[[something]]` back to a `[thing]` without TOML thinking that `thing` is part of `something` it's not.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Toml: Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language by mojombo on Friday July 13, 2018 @11:56AM (#17524014)
Curious. In order to be part of one of the tables in the [[something]] array, a table would need to be named [something.X]. What parser are you using? it's possible that it's behaving improperly in this case.

See the relevant part of the spec here: https://github.com/toml-lang/toml#user-content-array-of-tabl...

[ Parent | on HN ]