Re:Darts: Differentiable architecture search for convolution...
by osipov on Friday July 13, 2018 @10:45AM
(#17523341)
Why do you think that throwing compute at the problem is absurd? Arguably that's the approach that produced the resurgence of interest in CNNs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Darts: Differentiable architecture search for convolution...
by chadmeister on Friday July 13, 2018 @11:55AM
(#17524005)
Yes I think the whole point of Zoph and Le's research is to empirically demonstrate the desired trade off of compute cycles vs feature engineering
Re:Darts: Differentiable architecture search for convolution...
by smaddox on Friday July 13, 2018 @11:19AM
(#17523653)
I'm not the original commenter, but I think it's fair to say that throwing compute at the problem is absurd from an academic point of view (where the goal is understanding), but not from a commercial point of view. Although there's still some academic value in throwing compute at a problem, just to see what's possible.