Re:Bulletproofs – Short zero-knowledge arguments of knowledge
by pas on Thursday July 12, 2018 @03:58AM
(#17512932)
Maybe you can show only Waldo's face?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bulletproofs – Short zero-knowledge arguments of knowledge
by tomaha on Thursday July 12, 2018 @04:51AM
(#17513087)
The Waldo zk proof isn't a good example. You can easily fake knowing where Waldo is by gluing a Waldo to the board you use to hide the book. That way you can even proof you know a solution for a picture that doesn't even have Waldo in it.
Re:Bulletproofs – Short zero-knowledge arguments of knowledge
by throwawaymath on Thursday July 12, 2018 @10:51AM
(#17515183)
It's a perfectly fine example! It doesn't have to be academically rigorous, it just has to demonstrate the basic idea of proving a thing without exposing the thing. Yes, obviously it's not actually a formal ZKP, but analogies are imperfect.
Re:Bulletproofs – Short zero-knowledge arguments of knowledge
by hackathonguy on Thursday July 12, 2018 @05:37AM
(#17513224)
This can easily be remedied by having the verifier ensure the prover is in an empty room, equipped with only cardboard and scissors.