News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mystery Languages by skrishnamurthi on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @11:03PM (#17511875)
No, syntax is not merely bikeshedding, but endless discussions about it can certainly turn into that. I don't know what qualifies as "mainstream", but anything that sprang from the head of Milner, you can be sure, put semantics first. As, for that matter, did work from Dijkstra, Hoare, etc. Lots of good semantics work out there that has often indirectly had a huge influence on the mainstream.
Re:Mystery Languages by User23 on Thursday July 12, 2018 @01:05AM (#17512305)
I was engaging in a little hyperbole. Dijkstra has some compelling monographs on the value of choosing good syntax, it's true. You understood my meaning though as referring to the standard substandard discussion of the subject.

Yeah Dijkstra, Hoare, Knuth, Lamport, and friends are basically my heroes. Algol 60 is fine work. It has a very readable syntax. It's easy to see why it's even now used for scholarly publication. Hadn't heard of Milner though, any suggested reading?

Re:Mystery Languages by skrishnamurthi on Friday July 13, 2018 @08:09AM (#17522186)
I have to assume you're trolling me at this point, but just in case not:

https://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/milner_1569367.cfm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Milner

ML did not spring fully-formed from the heads of the creators of OCaml…

Re:Mystery Languages by User23 on Friday July 13, 2018 @11:54AM (#17523998)
I meant a work or works by Milner