Re:Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Foll...
by matchbok on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @10:37PM
(#17511769)
Verifying humans is a solved problem.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Foll...
by astrodust on Thursday July 12, 2018 @02:38PM
(#17517395)
Not really. You come up with a method and someone will come up with a way of factory-farming their way around it.
Re:Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Foll...
by andygates on Thursday July 12, 2018 @05:52AM
(#17513258)
Even assuming this is so, what's to prevent BotCo from hiring some humans to click through the process for each bot account?
Re:Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Foll...
by pavel_lishin on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @11:00PM
(#17511863)
Please fill us in.
Re:Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Foll...
by MaxBarraclough on Thursday July 12, 2018 @05:47AM
(#17513246)
I share your skepticism.
CAPTCHAs are at best a game of cat-and-mouse, and are always open to relay attacks anyway.
You can still verify in-person, and even check documents, but no web company would even consider doing that, even for something like an optional 'fully verified account' tag.
Re:Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Foll...
by pavel_lishin on Thursday July 12, 2018 @10:05AM
(#17514682)
Even something like checking a phone number just means that you're limiting the number of legitimate "bots" or alternate accounts people can have.
Re:Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Foll...
by MaxBarraclough on Thursday July 12, 2018 @10:11AM
(#17514764)
Indeed, that's a good way to raise the bar.
For small websites, even a completely trivial email check is enough to keep out most spammers.