News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on TSA screeners win immunity from flier abuse claims: U.S. appeals court. Parent comment

Re:TSA screeners win immunity from flier abuse claims: U.S. ... by DamnYuppie on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @12:09PM (#17507999)
> There's been progress on that front with several Trump administration officials confronted while dining for example.

No there hasn't. It just makes everyone think these are petulant children. They ask for respect and equality of others but don't wish to give it to anyone who doesn't agree with their ideology.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:TSA screeners win immunity from flier abuse claims: U.S. ... by s73v3r_ on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @01:15PM (#17508552)
"They ask for respect and equality of others but don't wish to give it to anyone who doesn't agree with their ideology."

In this case, "doesn't agree with their ideology" actually means, "Believes that many classes of people don't deserve human rights".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:TSA screeners win immunity from flier abuse claims: U.S. ... by AlexandrB on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @12:45PM (#17508309)
What's funny about your comment is that it's ambiguous whether you're calling the Trump officials or the protestors yelling at them petulant children.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:TSA screeners win immunity from flier abuse claims: U.S. ... by AnimalMuppet on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @12:53PM (#17508374)
Why does it have to be either/or? It could be both/and.

But in the instance of the comment in question, I think it was pretty clear that it was the protesters who were acting like petulant children.

[ Parent | on HN ]