Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt
by 3pt14159 on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @11:00AM
(#17507442)
We could just license the patents though, right? They have to license them for a fair price by law, so I don't see how this stops an open source computer. It's not like we're getting the gold wafers for free.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt
by kevin_thibedeau on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @12:14PM
(#17508033)
> They have to license them for a fair price by law
What law would that be? A patent holder can set whatever terms they want. Standards orgs try to impose FRAND for their contributors but it is not legally binding.
Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt
by 3pt14159 on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @07:46PM
(#17511140)
It's what my patent lawyer explained to me, but I may have misunderstood him. The impression he gave me was that if someone patented something super useful they couldn't simply ask for a trillion dollars to stop their competitors from using it.