News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt. Parent comment

Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt by TomVDB on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @09:39AM (#17506720)
Do you by any chance have concrete data or a source for the “by quantity and value” ?

I don’t doubt at all that it’s true, but I’d love to understand better what ARM’s exposure really is.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt by rwmj on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @10:19AM (#17507110)
I don't have figures for revenue, but ARM break out their volumes by Cortex line here, see the first KPI spreadsheet:

https://www.arm.com/company/investors/financial-results

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt by TomVDB on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @11:25AM (#17507636)
Summary units breakdown:

Classic ARM (7,9,11): 16%

Cortex-A: 19%

Cortex-R: 7%

Cortex-M: 58%

Of course, there is probably a large difference in licensing and royalty cost between the A series and the M series. Based on the numbers above, it wouldn’t surprise me if the A series results in higher revenue than the M.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt by rwmj on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @02:17PM (#17509045)
Oh sure, but I still wouldn't feel happy telling my shareholders that circa 75% of my product volume could disappear. And if that happened it would necessarily leave Cortex-A vulnerable (the Innovator's Dilemma in action).
[ Parent | on HN ]