News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Goodbye Microservices: From 100s of problem children to 1 superstar. Parent comment

Re:Goodbye Microservices: From 100s of problem children to 1... by johndubchak on Tuesday July 10, 2018 @04:48PM (#17502018)
We have these things. A better architect implies that one is trained in analyzing and producing these architectures using the science she/he was trained with: https://www.sei.cmu.edu/education-outreach/credentials/crede...

The certificate means nothing, the training and instruction is priceless. Add to that things like TOGAF and a deep understanding of the current state of existing architectures and you'll understand what I originally meant, but failed to explain.

UPDATE: misspelled "meant"

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Goodbye Microservices: From 100s of problem children to 1... by crimsonalucard on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @12:22AM (#17504463)
The closest mathematical formal system I've seen that dictates architecture is category theory. But even this system doesn't say anything about being "better" or more efficient than another design pattern.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Goodbye Microservices: From 100s of problem children to 1... by crimsonalucard on Tuesday July 10, 2018 @08:44PM (#17503515)
That's not science or proof. Thats a course on design. By science and proof I mean like definitive logic. a^2 + b^2 = c^2
[ Parent | on HN ]