Re:Comparing Serverless Performance for CPU Bound Tasks
by doczoidberg on Tuesday July 10, 2018 @04:03PM
(#17501576)
"Since I published this piece Microsoft have made significant improvements to HTTP scaling on Azure Functions and the below is out of date. Please see this post for a revised comparison. https://www.azurefromthetrenches.com/azure-functions-signifi...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Comparing Serverless Performance for CPU Bound Tasks
by com2kid on Tuesday July 10, 2018 @05:37PM
(#17502417)
Excellent, though 200ms seems like a long time for a service to respond to something, especially after being warmed up.
I'm only so-so happy about GCF's response time. I honestly wonder why these cloud functions take so long to execute after being warmed up.
Re:Comparing Serverless Performance for CPU Bound Tasks
by doczoidberg on Tuesday July 10, 2018 @06:00PM
(#17502580)
hmm firebase (google) cloud functions take 2,3s in average for me for a respond (simple json output out of firebase)
Re:Comparing Serverless Performance for CPU Bound Tasks
by com2kid on Tuesday July 10, 2018 @09:59PM
(#17503872)
My stupid JSON returning functions average out to around 50ms - 250ms.
I'm querying across a couple hundred rows. I'm reasonably certain that calling out to Perl and a regex would be faster for so little data. :/