News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on DigitalOcean’s quarterly report on developer trends in the cloud. Parent comment

Re:DigitalOcean’s quarterly report on developer trends in th... by abawany on Monday July 09, 2018 @07:20PM (#17494220)
According to [1], this is not true - it was intended to be an additive option.

[1] https://www.bretfisher.com/is-swarm-dead-answered-by-a-docke... from https://forums.docker.com/t/is-there-a-roadmap-for-docker-sw...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DigitalOcean’s quarterly report on developer trends in th... by BretFisher on Monday July 09, 2018 @08:06PM (#17494423)
Yep I wrote this, and it needs an update just months later. Lots happening.

Even today a big PR was pulled in to improve the scalability of Swarm https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/37372

More updates here https://github.com/docker/swarmkit/issues/2665#issuecomment-...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DigitalOcean’s quarterly report on developer trends in th... by sandGorgon on Tuesday July 10, 2018 @04:41AM (#17496315)
hi, what do you think about the approaches of CiliumProject ? (https://opensource.googleblog.com/2016/11/cilium-networking-...). They do have a Docker plugin (but does not work seamlessly with Swarm), but they claim to use BPF for superior performance https://cilium.io/blog/2018/04/17/why-is-the-kernel-communit...

I think the Kubernetes and Swarm devs have generally leveraged IPVS as the next step from iptables. Any thoughts on going straight to BPF ?

[ Parent | on HN ]