Re:Making a low level Linux debugger, part 3: our first program
by tropo on Monday July 09, 2018 @06:58PM
(#17494104)
He is taking after Linus Torvalds, who resisted adding a kernel debugger for many years. Linus used console spew, PC speaker beeps, and storing a hash of file/line into the PC's time/date.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Making a low level Linux debugger, part 3: our first program
by jjoonathan on Monday July 09, 2018 @11:14PM
(#17495154)
... who resisted adding a kernel debugger for the explicit purpose of keeping casuals out of his zen garden, per your link below.
For people who don't have a hoard of elite developers banging down their gates to contribute code for free, I suspect the economics of being such a Prima Donna are not as attractive.
Re:Making a low level Linux debugger, part 3: our first program
by hackcasual on Monday July 09, 2018 @07:17PM
(#17494205)
That's less not needing a debugger by design, more how challenging it is to debug an operating system.
Re:Making a low level Linux debugger, part 3: our first program
by tropo on Monday July 09, 2018 @07:50PM
(#17494363)
Those last two (speaker and clock) yes, but otherwise no. Linus Torvalds really doesn't like using a debugger and he'd rather you didn't use one either. His words:
Re:Making a low level Linux debugger, part 3: our first program
by Too on Tuesday July 10, 2018 @03:59PM
(#17501540)
Wow. Lets add some sleep in the compiler also so people will think harder about their code before compiling?