News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FAA pushes back on Boeing exemption for 787 safety flaw by skookumchuck on Friday July 06, 2018 @06:53PM (#17475728)
> if safety regulations can always be ignored for profits, plane manufacturers will build less safe planes over time.

Would you fly on an airplane that had a reputation for crashing? Me neither. Crashing airplanes is very, very bad for profits.

Re:FAA pushes back on Boeing exemption for 787 safety flaw by joe_the_user on Friday July 06, 2018 @09:25PM (#17476324)
Would you fly on an airplane that had a reputation for crashing? Me neither. Crashing airplanes is very, very bad for profits.

Would you bet your life that reputation alone was enough to keep an airliner from crashing? We know right now airlines shave every possible extra cost to achieve the lowest prices because passengers are very price sensitive.

Even more, right now a lot of people don't know they're flying on any number of regional airlines, some of which may have terrible reputations when they fly "United express" [1]. Consider that one of those airlines beating a passenger to get them off the plane didn't change the situation.

Of course, now we have safety standards rather than just reputation preventing crashes, which seems like the appropriate thing.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Express

Re:FAA pushes back on Boeing exemption for 787 safety flaw by skookumchuck on Friday July 06, 2018 @10:09PM (#17476476)
> Would you bet your life that reputation alone was enough to keep an airliner from crashing?

Please review the history of the DeHavilland Comet and the Lockheed Electra for what happened when an airliner acquired a reputation for being unsafe.