News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Horrors of Upgrading Etcd Beneath Kubernetes by threeseed on Friday July 06, 2018 @06:30PM (#17475614)
This is such nonsense not to mention hilariously hypocritical since you criticise "chasing the latest hotness" but then advocate for a Serverless architecture.

Anyway go and try and build a typical application with Lambda/SAM. It is a nightmare of complexity and all you are doing is moving your logic to AWS where you pay 100x the cost of just running it yourself in a container.

And the idea that Kubernetes isn't mature is pretty laughable. It's used everyday by Netflix, eBay, Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Lyft, Uber, Square, Google, Pinterest, Stripe, Airbnb, Yahoo, Salesforce etc. And with AWS you have EKS which allows you to run containers in a HA and managed way.

Re:The Horrors of Upgrading Etcd Beneath Kubernetes by outworlder on Friday July 06, 2018 @09:52PM (#17476413)
If you are not married to AWS, try GKE.

EKS is still... early. I'd rather manage myself with Kops or Terraform in its current stage. And in fact, that's what we do at my company.

Re:The Horrors of Upgrading Etcd Beneath Kubernetes by bfrydl on Friday July 06, 2018 @10:47PM (#17476657)
We tried using EKS. Unfortunately, HorizontalPodAutoscalers are configured to use metrics-server and it is not currently possible to run metrics-server on EKS. Had to replace it with a kops + terraform setup.
Re:The Horrors of Upgrading Etcd Beneath Kubernetes by etaioinshrdlu on Friday July 06, 2018 @09:49PM (#17476400)
No project with 759 confirmed bugs on Github should be considered mature, in my opinion.
Re:The Horrors of Upgrading Etcd Beneath Kubernetes by outworlder on Friday July 06, 2018 @09:55PM (#17476423)
This is a nonsensical metric and you know it. How many of these are production impacting? For me, that just reflects a lot of activity. Take a look at how many get resolved.

I manage a few hundred worker nodes, they are heavily loaded at all times but happily chugging along. My pager is silent and has been for a while now. Last k8s issue we saw was actually our own fault, due to a misconfiguration.

Re:The Horrors of Upgrading Etcd Beneath Kubernetes by etaioinshrdlu on Friday July 06, 2018 @10:04PM (#17476459)
I guess it is a little silly. But it remains a complicated project under heavy development.

I'm the kind of guy who enjoys Python 2.7 because it's deprecated, it's done changing :)

I try remember the maxim, Happiness is a Boring stack.

Re:The Horrors of Upgrading Etcd Beneath Kubernetes by mirceal on Friday July 06, 2018 @06:38PM (#17475658)
Ha. EKS is a joke. I have written services powered by lambda. As a matter of fact I’ve used AWS/GCP/Azure. I mentioned lambda as an example of a fully managed service - it was not to “endorse” serverless.

Also if you look at a container long enough and squint you will see the words serverless emerge.

I also had the “pleasure” of working with K8S. If anything, this looks like a pretty good play from Google to get you to eventually run your workloads in GCP.