And that's the most charitable evaluation. They "quickly determined that the baby was fine." So what did the hospital do, charge out the entire cost of running the ER to one unlucky family since they were the only case who was brought in that hour?
How so? In my country (Italy) for an MRI I would pay from 42 USD to 81 USD, depending on my income.
Not saying that's its real cost since we pay taxes to grant this to everyone, but from here to 18k...
Improved price transparency might help, and would be a relatively easy thing to improve, but with most patients not being responsible for paying their own costs, I'm not very optimistic about that route.
If one could incentivize every patient to upload their bills to an open source service that would crunch the data and spit it out anonymously online showcasing hospitals & services rendered + insurers et al.. then I think we might be on our way to true price transparency and a potential disruption in US healthcare.
My opinion based on limited information within the article is that the field EMS suspected a closed head injury. The trauma "doctors at the hospital quickly determined that baby Jeong Whan was fine". If the baby had an MRI instead of a medical exam by a team of specialists, the headline would lose some weight.
The fee is to staff ED specialists 24/7. I believe the better question is: "should we charge for resources that were used but stood down after initial assessment by the trauma team?" From the perspective of the EMS field, there are protocols that describe tbe patient condition, mechanism of injury and other indicators which dictate a trauma activation.
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trauma_center#Level_I