News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly. Parent comment

Re:Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly by interlocutor on Thursday July 05, 2018 @07:51PM (#17467861)
If you care about compile-time checking (you would, if you work on medium to large applications) then JSX (or the TypeScript variant, TSX) is much better because it catches invalid or mistyped attribute names etc.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly by hoppelhase on Friday July 06, 2018 @11:07AM (#17471997)
Looking at the sample in the usage section, I don't see why you could not just write a declaration file that would catch wrong attributes and so on.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly by bodas on Friday July 06, 2018 @04:30AM (#17469851)
Only because it is more mature. No reason you can't write a linter for hyperscript.
[ Parent | on HN ]