Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly

Re:Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly by mcbits on Thursday July 05, 2018 @06:54PM (#17467561)

Five (5) megabytes of JavaScript for a basic brochure site... I assume 99.9% of that is only necessary after signing up and signing in, not while unfortunately viewing the page on a less-than-flagship mobile device and metered data plan?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly by joshschreuder on Thursday July 05, 2018 @07:19PM (#17467698)

Welcome to web in 201x. This is not a problem exclusive to Vue.

With that said, the new vue-cli uses Webpack 4 now which can do code splitting, and you can code split on route also to make individual page bundles smaller.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly by carusooneliner on Thursday July 05, 2018 @07:38PM (#17467804)

It's going to change and get less hefty, we're looking into code splitting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly by caseymarquis on Thursday July 05, 2018 @10:43PM (#17468496)

Vue makes it incredibly easy!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly by BJanecke on Friday July 06, 2018 @02:44AM (#17469452)

The new module system makes it easy ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Vue.js: the good, the meh, and the ugly by sametmax on Friday July 06, 2018 @06:57AM (#17470403)

Not to mention the images. The home page background image alone is 600ko ! More than the entire HTML.

Saving the site on the hard drive gives me a wooping 10Mo for a home page. with a menu, a few pictures and some text.

This is insane.

[ Parent | on HN ]