Re:Booze, Sex, and the Dark Art of Dealmaking in China (2015)
by Letmesleep69 on Wednesday July 04, 2018 @11:49AM
(#17457854)
I have seen this a few times here on HN and it's just totally incorrect. The new law still places the burden of proving that consent was not given on the victim. Some papers reported it incorrectly but have published corrections.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Booze, Sex, and the Dark Art of Dealmaking in China (2015)
by cm2187 on Wednesday July 04, 2018 @12:56PM
(#17458235)
First result on google: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/consent-law-r...
I don't have a view on whether this reflects the Swedish law correctly but if it does, I don't believe that changes anything nor that I am incorrect. Unless the other party established explicit, provable consent (he says-she says won't help in court), we are in absence of consent, and therefore rape territory. You can't prove absence of anything.