Re:Show HN: Hottbox – Higher-Order Tensors Toolbox
by IlyaKisil on Tuesday July 03, 2018 @04:59PM
(#17453577)
I do agree that tensors are much more then just an array of data with N-indices and that numerical methods are oftentime forget about that.
Re:Show HN: Hottbox – Higher-Order Tensors Toolbox
by philipov on Tuesday July 03, 2018 @05:34PM
(#17453772)
I am looking for a python library that handles tensors, in the precise mathematical sense. Can you recommend one please?
Re:Show HN: Hottbox – Higher-Order Tensors Toolbox
by yorwba on Wednesday July 04, 2018 @04:03AM
(#17455878)
Maybe https://cadabra.science/ ? I haven't used it myself, but it's linked from the main page of http://www.sympy.org/ , which would also allow you to define tensor operations yourself if necessary.
Re:Show HN: Hottbox – Higher-Order Tensors Toolbox
by charlescearl on Tuesday July 03, 2018 @04:50PM
(#17453515)
Do you have any recommended readings for ML people from a CS background wishing to get an introduction to Tensor analysis?
Re:Show HN: Hottbox – Higher-Order Tensors Toolbox
by IlyaKisil on Tuesday July 03, 2018 @05:06PM
(#17453624)
I would suggest to search on YouTube for Tamara Kolda: Tensor decompositions. She also published a very good introductory paper “Tensor decompositions and applications” in 2008.
Re:Show HN: Hottbox – Higher-Order Tensors Toolbox
by charlescearl on Wednesday July 04, 2018 @07:42AM
(#17456645)
That is a great talk. Thanks for the link
The group where I did my PhD was a Numerical Relativity group and I now work in Machine Learning, so I can appreciate where you’re coming from.
However, a Tensor has a very precise mathematical meaning, and has done for centuries (dating back to at least Voigt, and arguably as far as Gauss). Even in machine learning, people recognise that they are abusing the term tensor by restricting its use to Tensors expressed in the canonical orthogonal basis of E^n.
I really think we should be discouraging this debasement of our mathematical terminology. It’s just not helpful at all.