Re:Dear-GitHub: Host Github by itself as an open source project
by simula67 on Tuesday July 03, 2018 @12:15AM
(#17447472)
> If Git repos just "had" wikis, issues, etc. inside them, the lock-in wouldn't be there
People clearly never cared about that, since Fossil ( https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wi... ) has these things and it never caught on
Re:Dear-GitHub: Host Github by itself as an open source project
by jhasse on Tuesday July 03, 2018 @05:50AM
(#17448843)
Maybe it didn't catch on because of other reasons.
Re:Dear-GitHub: Host Github by itself as an open source project
by kchoudhu on Monday July 02, 2018 @11:47PM
(#17447349)
This. Git is not a best in class solution, and the community that has coalesced around it has predictably not chosen best in class tooling.
This is okay. It's just source control at the end of the day.
Re:Dear-GitHub: Host Github by itself as an open source project
by tbrock on Monday July 02, 2018 @06:19PM
(#17445853)
Yeah good point. That’s definitely true.
I think though that 99%+ repos or there have zero issues, pull requests etc.
Re:Dear-GitHub: Host Github by itself as an open source project
by benologist on Monday July 02, 2018 @06:35PM
(#17445952)
Maybe there’s no secret sauce of any value and it’s just pointless github is closed source, like a form of DRM just being used against us cause we’re silly and let it be so even as we aspire to see open source flourish...
If Git repos just "had" wikis, issues, etc. inside them, the lock-in wouldn't be there, so people would be switching between Git hosts all the time—and there wouldn't really be much value in a "git host" at all, beyond what just having a Git dir on your own server, plus a native-GUI Git client supporting the wiki/issues/etc. features, would get you.