News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pointers Are More Abstract Than You Might Expect in C by golergka on Monday July 02, 2018 @02:35PM (#17444274)
This is true, but doesn't refute my point. If you want not only to write something in Rust, but also to participate in the community and get help from it, it's much easier to do it if you're using nightly.

I consider myself an experienced developer, but unlike other new technologies, which I almost always learn just from documentation, with Rust I often turn to community for help. I understand that this complexity is neccessary and I wouldn't Rust to be easier, of course. But still, with Rust's complexity and overwhelming amount of information that's already out of date with the best practices - it sometimes seems that over a half of google results on stack overflow are still about pre-1.0 Rust. And when we (people who learn Rust) turn to the community, it usually tells us (in the most helpful and nice way, of course) "just use nightly".

Re:Pointers Are More Abstract Than You Might Expect in C by steveklabnik on Monday July 02, 2018 @02:40PM (#17444307)
Yes, it is a bit unfortunate that many suggest nightly. It makes sense, given that they’re enthusiasts, and therefore know all about the latest and greatest. But, these days, it’s becoming rarer and rarer to actually need it. But that’s only generally; it’s true that embedded often still needs nightly, though that should change pretty soon!

I wish Google didn’t customize results so much; I rarely see anything pre-1.0. It really makes it hard to figure out how to best help :/