Re:Darpa invests $100M in a silicon compiler
by jandrese on Monday July 02, 2018 @03:52PM
(#17444823)
Maybe I should have clarified that the Navy never considered it to be a real ship, for the aforementioned lack of a role in the fleet. Bath Iron Works probably wanted to build hundreds of them but that was little more than a hopeful fantasy on their part.
Re:Darpa invests $100M in a silicon compiler
by hollerith on Wednesday July 04, 2018 @06:20PM
(#17459722)
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09defense.html states that 10 "were originally planned" though the intro to the wikipedia article says that "the class was intended to take the place of battleships in meeting a congressional mandate for naval fire support," so I'm not going to dispute your clarification because I know that Congress sometimes forces the Navy to buy things the Navy does not want.
You think wrong.