Re:Google and Nasdaq Pursuing Nano-Second Precision in Netwo...
by dagenix on Sunday July 01, 2018 @03:24PM
(#17437082)
I'm having a hard time trying to figure out if you are serious or if you are masterfully trolling everyone.
Re:Google and Nasdaq Pursuing Nano-Second Precision in Netwo...
by downer68 on Sunday July 01, 2018 @03:17PM
(#17437053)
Good job, guys! Nice downvotes! Real nice!
I answered substantively, addressing each point carefully, and I was pleasantly rewarded for the time I took to respond.
Great incentive system you guys have worked out! Glad to see it being used as intended! Works like a charm!
I think you are... JUMPING! TO CONCLUSIONS! (get it?)
Anyway, at it's core, much of the logic within a turing machine winds up being addition in an accumulator. So, you widen the pipeline, and that adds place settings to the numeric values addressed at a location in RAM.
I think we both know that each place setting increases the maximum valus of the addressible unit by an exponential factor of the base, which in computing, and so in this instance, is binary.
Specifically: 2^4096 instead of 2^64
Golly, did I get my math right? This sure is difficult to for me to understand!
Why would anyone want a 4096 bit CPU? Oh, I dunno. I suppose 640K ought to be enough for anyone.