News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AntiPolygraph.org appears to have been “de-listed” from G... by dewey on Saturday June 30, 2018 @08:50AM (#17430710)
> But this doesn't seem to account for the site being completely delisted from Google on such searches as "polygraph" and "lie detector."

It's not delisted, it's just not on the first page as other users also reported and I just verified myself.

With every change of the ranking algorithm there's a bunch of sites going up or down and nobody can tell you the exact reason why - it's easy to just call it censorship but in reality it's probably something else. Like the top comment already explained that your site markup has a bunch of missing information that makes it hard for search engines to properly scrape you.

Re:AntiPolygraph.org appears to have been “de-listed” from G... by wolco on Saturday June 30, 2018 @10:19AM (#17430943)
The markup rules were downgraded years ago. No h1 or title or meta tags shouldn't be the primary cause. Probably more to do with https, mobile and amp than the above factors.

Google has no problem scraping html pages and getting importance and content topics from inbound links, social media links and the actual text on the page.

Re:AntiPolygraph.org appears to have been “de-listed” from G... by ap_org on Saturday June 30, 2018 @08:59AM (#17430733)
What search term(s) did you use, and on what page of results did AntiPolygraph.org appear?
Re:AntiPolygraph.org appears to have been “de-listed” from G... by e2e8 on Saturday June 30, 2018 @12:54PM (#17431547)
The google search "beat a polygraph" gives antipolygraph.org as result number 10.

The google search "pass a polygraph" gives antipolygraph.org as result number 11.

The google search "polygraph" give antipolygraph.org as result number 188.

Re:AntiPolygraph.org appears to have been “de-listed” from G... by falcolas on Saturday June 30, 2018 @10:39AM (#17430999)
> With every change of the ranking algorithm there's a bunch of sites going up or down and nobody can tell you the exact reason why

And that is a problem. No company with as much influence on the web as Google has should be able to hide behind a phrase such as "it's just the algorithm". "De-rank every web site with the word humuhumunukunukuapua’a" is an algorithm too.

Every ranking should have a very clear reason, and legitimate web sites (yes, this is a judgement call, but a site with a history like this one would qualify) should have access to that reasoning behind their ranking.

Re:AntiPolygraph.org appears to have been “de-listed” from G... by dewey on Saturday June 30, 2018 @10:49AM (#17431035)
But isn't the reason that the exact ranking algorithms and factors are not public mostly to prevent people from gaming the system? If the exact formula for being the best ranked result would be public every seo-spam site would adapt to them too and everything becomes irrelevant again.