Re:Kubernetes 1.11 includes In-Cluster Service Load Balancin...
by Murrawhip on Thursday June 28, 2018 @03:04PM
(#17419582)
I currently use kubeadm for our small business cluster. 1 master and 2 nodes. We haven't put a ton into it but it seems to be running pretty well so far. Have done an upgrade from 1.7 to 1.9 without much/any downtime. Is there much more of a learning curve with Rancher?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Kubernetes 1.11 includes In-Cluster Service Load Balancin...
by Birch-san on Friday June 29, 2018 @09:35AM
(#17424403)
Rancher 1 is extremely easy to learn. Generally you do everything from the UI (I only use the CLI to view combined logs). High-availability is easy too; they provide a load-balancer (haproxy) with good UI integration.
Rancher 2 has a nicer UI and is more tightly related to Kubernetes. But there are moreorless zero docs, so be careful.
With either version: it's trivial to grab the master and node Docker images, and deploy them to your local machine to have a play.