News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete by wccrawford on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @01:25PM (#1740226)
"In my life, voice calls using cellphones fail more often than they succeed"

Well, thank God I don't live in the desolate wasteland that he does. I haven't had a problem with voice calls in years.

Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete by jsm386 on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @01:59PM (#1740374)
Try making a call on an iPhone in Midtown Manhattan, which is hardly a 'desolate wasteland'
Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete by vetinari on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @03:51PM (#1740862)
Midtown Manhattan may have capacity problems, too many callers and not enough towers. But dropping calls in Queens at 7 AM, now that is too much (no iPhone, I might add, but good old Nokia, that has seen its first dropped call there. But yes, roaming in AT&T network).
Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete by ghshephard on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @02:52PM (#1740609)
The point of the article was that a confluence of factors come together to reduce the effectiveness of cell phone calls, not that the Cell signal results in failed calls each time. Though, that does certainly seem to be a problem in many areas of Redwood City, CA - which is clearly not in the "Desolate Wasteland" class.
Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete by Tichy on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @06:19PM (#1741364)
Are these factors new, though? Because for a while there, cellphones seemed to be a working technology.
Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete by jules on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @07:04PM (#1741518)
I have never experienced a failed call and neither had I ever heard that it is a possibility until just now.