U.S. Supreme Court to hear civil forfeiture case

Re:U.S. Supreme Court to hear civil forfeiture case by 394549 on Monday June 25, 2018 @06:06PM (#17396237)

> Miranda v. Arizona was decided over 50 years ago. How relevant is the behavior of SCOTUS 50 years ago to predicting their present-day behavior? The membership is completely different, and there have been countless other changes in law and American society and culture over that period.

Because the Supreme Court is an institution with an institutional culture. Furthermore, its members obsessively study it's past decisions and their reasoning, so I'd expect its culture to have quite a bit of inertia.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. Supreme Court to hear civil forfeiture case by macintux on Monday June 25, 2018 @08:55PM (#17397150)

There are some disturbing indications that the more conservative current members feel less constrained by traditions and precedent. I don’t have the quotes handy but they were pretty explicit.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. Supreme Court to hear civil forfeiture case by 8note on Monday June 25, 2018 @10:17PM (#17397419)

that inherently seems off; conservatives are defined by trying to follow traditions and precedent. Not changing is their thing

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. Supreme Court to hear civil forfeiture case by macintux on Monday June 25, 2018 @10:31PM (#17397469)

I assume it’s related to Originalism: it’s time to return to first principles.

[ Parent | on HN ]