IRC.com Bought by London Trust Media, Pledges an IRC Revival

Re:IRC.com Bought by London Trust Media, Pledges an IRC Revival by rasengan on Saturday June 23, 2018 @07:14AM (#17380676)

Also, slack is like a dumbed down version of IRC. As an example, on IRC you could run an auction or a 10000 person university lecture because there is a +m channel mode (moderation).

+m quiets all users in the channel and only allows you to speak if you receive the channel-user mode +v (voice) or have +o (operator status). Some ircds also have a +h etc.

You can setup bots like “RaiseYourHand” for people who want to ask questions and need temporary voice (+v).

Try that on slack, telegram, signal, etc. Its impossible.

IRC was ACTUALLY built for collaboration and communication. Slack was built to make money.

The difference in goals causes a different outcome.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IRC.com Bought by London Trust Media, Pledges an IRC Revival by neoromantique on Saturday June 23, 2018 @07:44AM (#17380800)

While I get where you're coming at, but it is indeed possible in Telegram, not sure regarding Slack.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IRC.com Bought by London Trust Media, Pledges an IRC Revival by detuur on Sunday June 24, 2018 @08:08PM (#17389045)

Actually, Discord does this pretty well. I honestly consider it a 21st century successor to IRC. The unfortunate fact is that Discord is still a closed system, with not even the ability to run your own instance, instead with the owners insisting on a cloud-run infrastructure.

Just imagine how much better Discord, Slack, et al. could be if you could host your own instances with your own rules and with your own extensions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IRC.com Bought by London Trust Media, Pledges an IRC Revival by krageon on Monday June 25, 2018 @07:47AM (#17391548)

If it is closed (and nominally 'free' for the average user), you have to assume everything you say and do is being mined and sold to the highest bidder. How can something like that be the successor to anything?

[ Parent | on HN ]