Re:IRC.com Bought by London Trust Media, Pledges an IRC Revival
by greglindahl on Friday June 22, 2018 @05:58PM
(#17377792)
Protocols which have a minimum implementation are fine. Protocols which prohibit extensions end up with them anyway.
Trust me, I attempted to veto a few things in IRC's early life, they are all in there now, can't stop them.
My biggest issue with the protocol is that if I want to develop for an advanced data interchange protocol there shouldn't be any optional extras. Everything should be in the spec and required of real clients. (I can, however, envision a protocol in which 'relay servers' exist that don't need to fully understand a message to pass it's content.)