News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Rules Police Need Warrant to Track Your Cel... by pmoriarty on Friday June 22, 2018 @01:53PM (#17375918)
"Warrant means an audit trail and coordination with a prosecutor and the judiciary. ... There is accountability and more transparency"

Who's actually auditing these people and holding them accountable?

When was the last time someone lost their job because they issued too many warrants, or were too lax in issuing them?

Is a warrant more than just a rubber stamp?

"Supreme Court asks surveillance state to wear a fig leaf" might be a more accurate title.

Re:Supreme Court Rules Police Need Warrant to Track Your Cel... by pm90 on Friday June 22, 2018 @06:56PM (#17378210)
It is my opinion that just having to ask a judge for a warrant makes law enforcement officers do a lot more work than if they could just invade someone's privacy as a matter of due course. I don't think I've heard of any judges getting fired for issuing too many warrants, but judges occupy a special place in our society: they are people learned enough in the law of the land that we invest in them the power to adjudicate disputes. The assumption is that the judges hold themselves to a higher standard.