Re:Zen Magnets: 6 Years of Battle End in Victory
by tptacek on Friday June 22, 2018 @01:11AM
(#17371507)
What CPSC document are you relying on for that assertion? I just read the 2017 Zen Magnet ALJ decision, and it revolves around the marketed intended use for the products:
The intended use and operation of the Subject Products require the magnets to be
separated and reattached to create and reshape the magnets into a variety of figures, sculptures, structures, jewelry, and art. See, e.g., Exs. R-55 (product guide with examples of structures that can be created with the Subject Products); R-139 (“Never Let Go of Childhood Wonder” demonstration video
Two obvious observations:
- "Childlike wonder"? Really?
- If there's any use for these things that is more dangerous than desk toys, it's jewelry.
The intended use and operation of the Subject Products require the magnets to be separated and reattached to create and reshape the magnets into a variety of figures, sculptures, structures, jewelry, and art. See, e.g., Exs. R-55 (product guide with examples of structures that can be created with the Subject Products); R-139 (“Never Let Go of Childhood Wonder” demonstration video
Two obvious observations:
- "Childlike wonder"? Really?
- If there's any use for these things that is more dangerous than desk toys, it's jewelry.