If a company implicitly assists in putting little children in camps, then yes, it’s ok to “punish” them by not giving them your business.
“Just like one may dislike in-laws while loving a spouse. You don't have to divorce your spouse to prove your dislike of the inlaws”
Similarly, if my in-laws were racists and my wife didn’t think that there were anything wrong with that, then yes, divorce would be an option.
https://news.vice.com/article/the-us-keeps-mistakenly-deport...
isn’t that a property of free market capitalism that people promote?
Take Kansas, for example. Israel buys a lot of weapons from us, and they commit war crimes against Arabs for us, so in thanks Kansas has made it illegal to boycott Israel.
Yet I cannot legally buy a musical instrument from Iran without fear of going to jail for violating federal sanctions.
The same agency, ICE, does LOADS of good work, protecting America and it's citizens. Much like Microsoft (or any company)- that offers useful, widely deployed products.
Supporting GitHub/MSFT or doing business with them doesn't have to come with an implied liking of ICE.
Just like one may dislike in-laws while loving a spouse. You don't have to divorce your spouse to prove your dislike of the inlaws