Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try

Re:Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try by gnicholas on Thursday June 21, 2018 @12:58AM (#17362274)

> Everyone has the right to free speech - but no one has the right to avoid consequences for that speech

This is actually not true. For example, it would have been illegal for Mozilla to fire Eich for his donation. This is because political activity is considered protected in California (like gender, race, etc.), so firing someone for making a political statement or for donating to a political cause is illegal.

We will probably learn more about this defense as the Google/Damore case proceeds.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try by dagenix on Thursday June 21, 2018 @01:17AM (#17362326)

Which isn't what happened here. The consequence he faced was that his employees demanded his resignation. He resigned.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try by BrendanEich on Monday July 02, 2018 @08:45PM (#17446597)

Hi, you are mistaken on many facts here. I'll start with this claim. No employees at the Mozilla Corporation demanded that I resign. Six Mozilla Foundation (the non-profit .org with arms-length management and separate board) tweeted that I should step down (see https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/03/mozil... which fails to note their employer was not the company to which I had been appointed CEO, although I was founder of both orgs). They never worked for me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try by communist_ on Wednesday July 04, 2018 @04:51PM (#17459395)

This is not true. I have friends who were working at Mozilla who tweeted condemning you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Firefox is back. It's time to give it a try by BrendanEich on Wednesday July 04, 2018 @05:45PM (#17459594)

At the Mozilla Corporation? That was what @dagenix specified in the grandparent comment by "... his employees ...." Unless they deleted their tweets, let's see those twitter links.

A green handle of "communist_" does not inspire automatic belief that you truly had friends at Mozilla Corporation or know of any such tweets.

Again, if you mean the six Mozilla Foundation employees who tweeted against me as (poorly) reported by Ars Technica (see https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/03/mozil...), they were not "his employees". They worked for an entirely separate organization from the one I was running.

Back-story: Mozilla Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit set up in 2003 (I was founding board member, and a co-founder of mozilla.org in 1998 at the start). Mozilla Corporation is the for-profit, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation which exists at arms length to make taxable revenue from Firefox. The two orgs are loosely connected; the Mozilla Foundation is much smaller and all about getting and giving grants.

[ Parent | on HN ]