News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Making Debian Responsible For Its Actions by cemerick on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @08:03AM (#1735388)
s/Ruby/Ruby, Perl, Java, Python

If everyone thinks you're off in the wilderness, you might want to check yourself, maybe just a bit.

Re:Making Debian Responsible For Its Actions by bryanlarsen on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @08:59AM (#1735520)
1. Perl isn't nearly as broken on Debian as Ruby is. Don't know about the others.

2. These packaging systems were all designed by and for developers. Debian was designed by and for system administrators. The fact that there are common problems is not surpising.

Re:Making Debian Responsible For Its Actions by cemerick on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @11:42AM (#1736019)
Fair enough re: #2. Given that, it's not at all surprising that the ruby and python folk have done rvm and pip (which, in a faux-spectrum, is a big shift towards what maven et al. provide in the java world).

Of course, it's the debian maintainers' prerogative to structure things such that others generally pick up their toys and go play in their own sandboxes. I just get irritated when I hear people griping about it when it happens, as if system-level package managers have some kind of inherent priority.