Microsoft Employees Pressure Leadership to Cancel ICE Contract

Re:Microsoft Employees Pressure Leadership to Cancel ICE Con... by madaxe_again on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @04:20AM (#17353501)

But they are accountable. Money talks, bullshit walks - and as more and more businesses move towards a service rather than ownership model, this becomes more and more likely, and the power of other businesses and consumers to use a different service and hit them in the wallet grows.

I mean, as it is, I cannot use Microsoft or Apple products to design or proliferate nuclear, chemical or biological weapons (its in the EULA) - is this an infringement on my rights? Where should this line be drawn?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft Employees Pressure Leadership to Cancel ICE Con... by ggg9990 on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @11:48AM (#17356479)

Federal law already prohibits you from making nuclear weapons, whether you’re using Excel on iOS or not. Why should a company draw a line anywhere?

For example, most grocery stores don’t sell eggs to youngsters near Halloween for fear they will egg people. But there are teenagers who have to run entire households and cook breakfast for several kids, and need eggs. In a locally owned corner shop this isn’t a problem because the owner knows the kids and their situations. But as Walmart’s and Safeways displace these stores, policy is set by headquarters, and local employees can’t deviate. At that point, who does the kid take the grievance to? If it’s a local ordinance the kid’s advocates can go to a town meeting. If it’s a Walmart how do the kid’s advocates petition headquarters?

[ Parent | on HN ]