The response from Microsoft management is good I think. They mention it's just about email, calendar, etc. There's nothing special in providing that. The Google case was quite different.
It is not a fallacy, it should be the first thing anyone should consider when establishing a new authority.
---
Incidentally when looking up exact quotes for another reply in this thread I found this WaPo article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/01/10...
"Dutch journalists peppered Hoekstra with questions on unsubstantiated claims he made in 2015 about chaos that the “Islamic movement” had allegedly brought to the Netherlands.
“There are cars being burned. There are politicians that are being burned,” he said then, at a conference hosted by a conservative group. “And yes, there are no-go zones in the Netherlands.”
The comments have widely been described as inaccurate, [...]"
Right. 'Inaccurate', not even the WaPo is calling a lie a lie.
Advertisement is also riddled with half truth, exaggerations, and carefully selected statistics. Yet false advertisement is still illegal. And in my opinion advertisement should be much more strongly restricted still.
As it is you've just reiterated the (IMO) fallacious slippery slope argument, and not addressed my point that it's a fallacy.
Just because there is a grey area doesn't mean we need to freeze in paralysis. I say because of the grey area we should be careful with where we draw the line, but the existence of grey does not make it impossible or prohibitively dangerous to draw one. Otherwise we would have no laws.