The only other issue the IG had was with Comey's public statements about the Clinton emails investigation. Even there he concludes that Comey wasn't acting out of political bias, and instead just somewhat mishandled an extremely unusual case.
I would hardly call those conclusions damning.
Incorrect; the story you linked describes unaccompanied minors. Separating families is solely the doing of the Trump Administration.
"Detaining child border crossers was a policy during the Obama administration, where Breitbart Texas exclusively reported on the conditions in which unaccompanied minors were being packed into crowded cells and holding facilities."
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/03/us/politics/new-us-effort...
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/17/us/us-sets-up-crisis-shel...
>Were Microsoft employees sleeping when reports of these sorts of situations where being reported in 2014? Or was it more acceptable then because it was a different president?
The key issue here which is different from what you suggest is the same in 2014 is that the Trump administration separates children from their parents. The Obama administration, rightly or wrongly, detained unaccompanied minors. The Trump administration is detaining children who had their parents with them, and in cases deporting parents without their children. Surely you see this as a different situation??
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/18/photos-ob...
Kids were being separated then and being housed in the exact same facilities being used now.
Interestingly, this story “breaks” the exact same week the FBI inspector general’s report was released.
I am not judging the wrongness or rightness of what is and has happened in terms of illegal immigrants, however, a thinking person ought to be very skeptical about how this story catches fire at exactly the same time a significant piece of news happens: the inspector general’s damning report of the FBI. Were Microsoft employees sleeping when reports of these sorts of situations where being reported in 2014? Or was it more acceptable then because it was a different president?