Re:LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off
by viraptor on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @06:54AM
(#1735247)
Could someone describe what's the difference between LibreOffice approach and GoOo approach now? Why didn't they build on GoOo, but forked again instead?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Good point. Judging from http://www.documentfoundation.org/supporters/ , which apparently includes Novell and most everybody, they got their ducks in a row.
However, not everybody seems thrilled at http://planet.go-oo.org/ ...
P.S. more coverage over at http://lwn.net
Re:LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off
by ciupicri on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @09:30AM
(#1735603)
You forgot Red Hat and Canonical, although I don't know how much they contribute compared to Novell.
Re:LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off
by jbellis on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @08:30AM
(#1735438)
Damn it, another misclicked arrow on my phone. sorry about the downvote.
Re:LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off
by nedrichards on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @12:12PM
(#1736145)
Go-OO is maintained as a series of patches which can be applied independently by distributions to add or remove features; this is intended to replace the OOo project entirely.
Or, to try and use a historical analogy, this is the tipping point from 'a patchy server' to Apache.