News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off by viraptor on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @06:54AM (#1735247)
Could someone describe what's the difference between LibreOffice approach and GoOo approach now? Why didn't they build on GoOo, but forked again instead?
Re:LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off by ableal on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @07:25AM (#1735295)
Good point. Judging from http://www.documentfoundation.org/supporters/ , which apparently includes Novell and most everybody, they got their ducks in a row.

However, not everybody seems thrilled at http://planet.go-oo.org/ ...

P.S. more coverage over at http://lwn.net

Re:LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off by ciupicri on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @09:30AM (#1735603)
You forgot Red Hat and Canonical, although I don't know how much they contribute compared to Novell.
Re:LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off by jbellis on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @08:30AM (#1735438)
Damn it, another misclicked arrow on my phone. sorry about the downvote.
Re:LibreOffice tells Oracle to fork off by nedrichards on Tuesday September 28, 2010 @12:12PM (#1736145)
Go-OO is maintained as a series of patches which can be applied independently by distributions to add or remove features; this is intended to replace the OOo project entirely.

Or, to try and use a historical analogy, this is the tipping point from 'a patchy server' to Apache.