Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by woolvalley on Tuesday June 19, 2018 @02:22AM
(#17344222)
The drivers pay gas taxes, and the majority of the revenue goes to the drivers. Therefore car activity that uber induces is also paid for by the customers that use it. Basic induction. What you are doing is like complaining about amazon or the local grocer inducing truck demand and not paying for the roads.
It's a bit obvious you have a chip on your shoulder about Uber and ride share companies in general.
Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by icebraining on Tuesday June 19, 2018 @10:26AM
(#17346947)
Careful about mistaking accounting for economics. If gas taxes were lowered to zero, could Uber increase their share of the ride payment by the current tax amount, without harming their relationship with the drivers? If so, then Uber is paying that tax, not the drivers.
Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by selectodude on Tuesday June 19, 2018 @12:31PM
(#17348114)
Maybe if gasoline weren't extremely inelastic, your begging the question wouldn't be so ridiculous. I pay $4.00/gal for gas. The gas tax is 18 cents. Under 5 percent. Yes, I suppose Uber could lower their cut by a tenth of a percent and really put some extra change in my pocket!!
PS. I have an expensive piece of paper in economics and statistics, but I appreciate you telling me to be careful. Gotta have somebody looking out for me, i suppose.
Uber doesn't pay a cent in gas taxes (they're not employees, they're partners, right?), and since they've never made money before, they don't pay a cent in taxes either.