Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by vinay427 on Monday June 18, 2018 @10:15PM
(#17343301)
The GP was referring to a problem with GPS, not their cellular connection. In any case, I haven't noticed any issues with T-mobile in San Francisco, so maybe T-mobile has some weaknesses unique to the Chicago area.
Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by dvtrn on Tuesday June 19, 2018 @03:20PM
(#17349535)
I'm fully aware but in the context of GPS reception on cellular devices--prompting me to ask what I thought was a tangential question. Apologies that this was such a severe faux pas to end up downvoted into the negatives.
Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by r00fus on Tuesday June 19, 2018 @12:37AM
(#17343876)
Last time in Chi-town (2016) I had the best signal of the bunch with my TMO (others mostly on ATT/VZ).
Of course, over-subscription is a thing, so maybe things degraded?
Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by selectodude on Monday June 18, 2018 @10:26PM
(#17343355)
Verizon, unfortunately. Though a lot of the issue isn't signal but bandwidth. There are just too many people. You'll have five bars and nothing will load. That's what caused me to leave T-Mobile.
Can anyone recommend a carrier with better QOS here or is this just inherent to my new life in a giant city? I'll get over it and adapt, just keeping my options open.