Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by inferiorhuman on Tuesday June 19, 2018 @12:18AM
(#17343803)
> Uber's driver and rider acquisition costs (marketing, promotions, ads, etc.) are astronomical.
Which is hilarious to me. Uber is spending a ton of money, and very little of it trickles down to the people that make Uber possible (the drivers).
Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by haldean on Tuesday June 19, 2018 @12:57AM
(#17343965)
"we lose money on each sale but we make up for it in volume"
Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by code_duck on Monday June 18, 2018 @10:31PM
(#17343373)
Won't there be some point at which they're established and don't need to work so hard at those things?
Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by smt88 on Monday June 18, 2018 @10:53PM
(#17343468)
Probably not. Riders and drivers are both primarily price-driven. They have little or no brand loyalty. It's a low-margin, race-to-the-bottom type of business.
L5 self-driving cars will be a game-changer for a while, assuming Uber gets exclusivity from Waymo (which now owns a stake in Uber).
Re:Uber is experimenting with letting riders wait longer for...
by code_duck on Tuesday June 19, 2018 @10:05AM
(#17346697)
It seems to me that they are very well known at this point, and don't have significant competition. I don't see why they would be spending so much money for marketing... maybe in the past, maybe in the future. I must not understand the market.
I'm sure there's plenty of analysis of this out there, so I should read some articles.
They can't easily scale these efforts back because the value of the service plummets for all parties if they lose their economy of scale.