News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by eropple on Friday June 15, 2018 @08:59PM (#17325100)
> How much risk do you expect police to take on?

All of it. I will trade a hundred dead police officers for one citizen who would have been unjustly harmed and sleep soundly for it.

Police receive power from the state and significant social plaudits. In exchange, they place the well-being of every citizen over their own. That's the deal. It is being abrogated regularly. That needs to change.

Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by techsupporter on Friday June 15, 2018 @11:16PM (#17325616)
> In exchange, they place the well-being of every citizen over their own. That's the deal.

Sadly, this hasn't been the deal in my lifetime and, to hear my parents--both of whom were police officers--tell it, for longer than that.

Every person I've ever interacted with who is or has been a police officer has said that the message is that your first duty is to "go home to your family." The "bad guys" aren't worthy of self-sacrifice and heroics. Now if you, as an officer, happen to die because you selflessly saved "a civilian" (notice how that's different from "a bad guy"), then you are seen as deserving of all of the heroic writings ever to be written about a human.

But if you die as a result of a supposedly-preventable outcome of a confrontation with "a bad guy", meaning that you didn't fire soon enough or you tried non-lethal methods in a situation such as described here, then you're just an idiot. So you've not so much sacrificed as a hero but simply failed.

I genuinely don't think that any police officer, or at least any significant number of them, sees themselves as having placed the well-being of every citizen-including-"perps" over their own. I kind of get it; when it comes to me versus the other guy, of course I want to be the one still alive at the end. I guess that means there's something fundamentally broken with how we parcel out state-backed forced.

Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by eropple on Saturday June 16, 2018 @12:20PM (#17328007)
> I genuinely don't think that any police officer, or at least any significant number of them, sees themselves as having placed the well-being of every citizen-including-"perps" over their own.

I agree with this depiction of the current state of affairs.

I am saying that it is bonkers and wrong, because it is bonkers and wrong.

You can't have a free society that fears its police.

Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by throwaway080383 on Saturday June 16, 2018 @01:02PM (#17328202)
I can simultaneously be okay with the police shooting a man coming at them aggressively with a pipe and not fear the police, because I have no intention of going after the police with a pipe.
Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by orf on Saturday June 16, 2018 @05:22PM (#17329500)
Or aggressively pulling his trousers up whilst lying in a hallway begging for his life.

Warning, this is terrible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBUUx0jUKxc&has_verified=1

Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by throwaway080383 on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @10:36PM (#17413649)
Didn't even have to click the link. I still generally don't fear the police because I do think that video was an exception, but yeah... that man was murdered.
Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by ThrowawayR2 on Friday June 15, 2018 @09:28PM (#17325222)
> All of it. I will trade a hundred dead police officers for one citizen who would have been unjustly harmed and sleep soundly for it.

And where are you going to find people self-sacrificing enough to take that job?

Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by eropple on Friday June 15, 2018 @10:28PM (#17325470)
I would rather have trouble finding police officers than find places to bury the citizens who bad police victimize.
Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by throwaway080383 on Saturday June 16, 2018 @01:46PM (#17328443)
Do you actually think there would be fewer dead bodies if there were significantly fewer police?
Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by SuoDuanDao on Saturday June 16, 2018 @07:20AM (#17326975)
You could institute some kind of a draft. And I imagine fewer people would break the law if they had to enforce it for two years.
Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by gspetr on Saturday June 16, 2018 @11:13AM (#17327698)
http://www.frfrogspad.com/fantasy.htm

"The question that is frequently asked is Under what circumstances does the state or municipal entities have a constitutional duty to protect citizens from violence at the hands of private actors?

The general answer to this question is that there is no constitutional duty to protect free citizens. The only clear case of a duty to protect is when a citizen is in the custody of a state or municipality."

Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by eropple on Saturday June 16, 2018 @12:20PM (#17328000)
Respectfully: you are assuming, with this answer, that I do not understand what the currently-held jurisprudence is. And not that I assert that that jurisprudence is horseshit. Because I do understand it, and it is horseshit.
Re:Judge says ‘literal but nonsensical’ Google translation i... by gspetr on Thursday June 28, 2018 @10:26AM (#17417109)
No, I respect you as an HN contributor and wouldn't offend your intelligence with that.

Since comments are public I don't necessarily address the parent poster with them, I also speak to the broader reader/commenter base.

I should have made myself clear on that, sorry.