Re:FBI Recovers WhatsApp, Signal Data Stored on Michael Cohe...
by ebikelaw on Friday June 15, 2018 @07:11PM
(#17324509)
Nothing on Google Drive is stored "in clear text".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FBI Recovers WhatsApp, Signal Data Stored on Michael Cohe...
by tgsovlerkhgsel on Friday June 15, 2018 @07:28PM
(#17324643)
If I put a file with certain content into Google Drive, then Google Drive, or a subpoena for my Google Drive data, will return exactly those contents.
Hence, it is reasonable to apply any distinction to the content as a user of Google Drive sees it, and not as it may be stored on the backend. Hence, if the data WhatsApp pushes to the Google Drive API is unencrypted (and we're talking about the data, not about the HTTPS-encapsulated form that passes over the network), it is reasonable to call it "in clear text", and it wouldn't be reasonable to call it encrypted.
Re:FBI Recovers WhatsApp, Signal Data Stored on Michael Cohe...
by xwvvvvwx on Friday June 15, 2018 @07:21PM
(#17324579)
It's clear to Google.
Re:FBI Recovers WhatsApp, Signal Data Stored on Michael Cohe...
by m-p-3 on Friday June 15, 2018 @09:49PM
(#17325323)
Unless you control the encryption keys in the communication, always assume it's accessible in plaintext.
Re:FBI Recovers WhatsApp, Signal Data Stored on Michael Cohe...
by meesles on Friday June 15, 2018 @07:20PM
(#17324570)
...are you a Google Drive dev? How can you possibly make this statement?
Re:FBI Recovers WhatsApp, Signal Data Stored on Michael Cohe...
by Sylos on Saturday June 16, 2018 @11:04AM
(#17327664)
It's maybe not stored in clear text, but it is at the very least stored in a form that Google can decrypt.
They would not be able to recover your data upon requesting a password reset, if they used proper end-to-end-encryption.