Re:White House announces 25 percent tariff on Chinese tech g...
by handbanana on Friday June 15, 2018 @06:17PM
(#17324093)
Care to explain your reason for thinking that?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:White House announces 25 percent tariff on Chinese tech g...
by enraged_camel on Friday June 15, 2018 @06:21PM
(#17324131)
It is actually quite self-explanatory: if an action that is intended to protect one party (US electronics manufacturers) at the expense of another party ends up instead harming the former, then by definition said action is good for no one.
Re:White House announces 25 percent tariff on Chinese tech g...
by ojbyrne on Friday June 15, 2018 @06:36PM
(#17324262)
It’s actually good for every country not affected by it.
Re:White House announces 25 percent tariff on Chinese tech g...
by chris_wot on Friday June 15, 2018 @07:06PM
(#17324482)
Name even one country not adversely affected by increased tariffs? I’m genuinely curious who comes out ahead on this.
Re:White House announces 25 percent tariff on Chinese tech g...
by ojbyrne on Friday June 15, 2018 @07:33PM
(#17324675)
In this case, where the US imposed tariffs on electronic components from China, every country that imports electronic components from China except the US.
Re:White House announces 25 percent tariff on Chinese tech g...
by handbanana on Friday June 15, 2018 @07:24PM
(#17324602)
Do you have any references/information showing that it harms the majority of US electronics manufacturers? Just wondering how you came to that conclusion