Re:GitLab Web IDE
by RhodesianHunter on Friday June 15, 2018 @08:00PM
(#17324813)
> The AWS interface is still a byzantine nightmare of a labyrinth
I've heard this enough times to know that it's widely agreed upon, but I've never understood it personally.
Re:GitLab Web IDE
by spurcell93 on Friday June 15, 2018 @08:38PM
(#17324987)
Given the absolutely massive and technical amount of features that aws requires, it's not surprising (or even worthy of condemnation) that the interface can get somewhat convoluted. That said, I wonder if there is a stripped down version of that interface that would better accommodate a hypothetical cohort of extremely common use cases. I would bet there isnt, which is why the interface is so.... Deep.
Re:GitLab Web IDE
by stephengillie on Saturday June 23, 2018 @10:52AM
(#17381511)
There's a way to pin sections to the nav bar. So you can pin EC2, IAM, RDS, and VPC up there if you mainly use those 4 services.
It's a bit of a nightmare, as a support engineer, to get access requests for AWS services you've never heard of before. "Need access to AWS services: Cloud9, Memento, Athena, and Pandora Nexus." Each having a completely unique set of granular permissions to fumble over means most users get full permissions to the requested service until the auditors complain.
Re:GitLab Web IDE
by ianlevesque on Friday June 15, 2018 @09:37PM
(#17325266)
Not exactly what you describe but Amazon does have Lightsail for this purpose.
Re:GitLab Web IDE
by stephengillie on Saturday June 23, 2018 @10:47AM
(#17381483)
Administrators beware - this auto-set up creates wide open security groups and other misconfigurations. Some of these will show up on your Trusted Advisor report.
Agreed that it's a higher barrier of entry compared to how simple and slick the c9.io interface was.