News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hire Family People by jrockway on Thursday April 24, 2008 @10:38PM (#173186)
And the laws are kind of weird. If you say you discriminate, but don't, you've committed a crime. If you say you don't discriminate, but do, it's not a crime. (I think the reality is that everyone discriminates in favor of "people they like" anyway. It is somewhat scary that we have so many thought crimes now.)
Re:Hire Family People by DaniFong on Thursday April 24, 2008 @10:56PM (#173192)
There are certain examples of hiring discrimination which are pretty clear cut. I am not sure if the cases have been tested in court, however.

See for example http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20030430-000001....

The paper is "Implicit Discrimination." Marianne Bertrand, Dolly Chugh and Sendhil Mullainathan; American Economic Review, 2005, 95(2), pp. 94-98.

if you have access. Unfortunately, I don't at this time.

The basic results are that a resume with a 'black' name versus a 'white' name (and no other difference) are far less likely to fetch callbacks. Further, there's no appreciable difference in callbacks for black candidates with increasing skills, whereas there's a drastic increase for white candidates.

There are many other studies, and then there's my own, personal experience, which I'm not about to get into.

Re:Hire Family People by hacklite on Saturday April 26, 2008 @03:33AM (#174228)
I presume you're referring to age/gender discrimination.

At least people generally recognize that sexism is wrong. There is a lot less raised consciousness when it comes to ageism.

You start college early, and everyone says you're too young. And then later, ironically, you find when you hit 30 that the thinking has recently shifted when it comes to start-ups, so then you're too old.