News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Limits of Expertise by mannykannot on Thursday June 14, 2018 @04:22PM (#17315025)
"Crashing the plane" is not the best metaphor. In the case of politics and economics, we have, broadly speaking, two tribes of experts who disagree, at a fundamental level, on many things. Furthermore, they have both been repeatedly blindsided by events - their expertise seems to consist mostly of being able to explain, in great detail and certainty, but always after the event, why the opposing tribe's fundamental beliefs inevitably caused the problem.
Re:The Limits of Expertise by Latteland on Thursday June 14, 2018 @11:25PM (#17317324)
Both sides have used some amount of science, logic and fair observations over many of their years of observation, but recently one side has stopped doing that. today we really don't have "just disagreeing tribes". We have science and logic vs opinion.
Re:The Limits of Expertise by citrablue on Friday June 15, 2018 @12:17AM (#17317519)
To be fair, we don't really know what works in terms of governance and what doesn't.

We do know what science currently says, but that doesn't mean it will forever indicate the same conclusion (to wit: nutrition). It does not provide much insight into a complex world like politics and civics, which are better thought of as an open system with unclear interactions between inputs.

(Also: "science" is not some unified view that has the on-high pope with decrees.)

Re:The Limits of Expertise by s3m4j on Friday June 15, 2018 @08:09AM (#17319137)
I think what I meant was, as there's only "one plane" we can't really make economic experiences in a lab and see which one is best. Ergo political economy expertise may be [ed: is] absolute bullshit.